Thinking science cover and preface

Abdel Hernandez san Juan

Thinking Science

New Phenomenological avenues between philosophy and sociology

Contents

The Iteration of culture. By Abdel Hernandez san Juan

Epistemology, performativity of research and cultural theory. By Abdel Hernández san Juan

The Sensible Concept: The Mediation between subject and object. By Abdel Hernandez san Juan

The Restauration of World: Presence and phenomenological genesis of the sign. By Abdel Hernández san Juan

The Door swing between the self and the symbolic. By Abdel Hernández San Juan

The Dialectique of evocation. By Abdel Hernández San Juan

Aknowledgment

General Bibliography

    Pure spatiality determine itself in negating the indetermination that constitute it, I mean, negating itself. Negating itself, this negation must be a negation determined, negation of the space by the space. The first spatial negation of space is the dot. The dote is the space without occupying space, a place without a place, it suppresses and substitute places occupying the place of space which at the same time negate and conservate. It negates spatiality the space but at the same time the dote goes to be in contact with itself, meaning, with another dot, and this is a first negation of negation, the spatial negation of the dote is the line, the dot retains and extend, it is sustained substituted by the line which constitute its true, but this negation is in a second level spatial, the dote is the line, the first being other, meaning, the spatial being of the dote. According to the same process of negation of negation the true of the line is the surface but this true of being other is a negation of negation again. The line become a surface which on the one hand is a determination in respect to lines and dotes, in this sense surface in general but which according with the same retained negation suppressed of the space it is at the same time the restauration of the totality of the space, of a space as a whole, the space have become then concrete and in reverse we must demonstrate the opposite that such a movement of producing the surfaces concrete totality of the space is a full circle and reversible. We can demonstrate that a line is composed of negated dots and the suffice of negated lines

Jacques Derrida

The iteration of culture

©By Abdel Hernandez San Juan

Written in English and translated to English by Abdel Hernandez San Juan

       In a highly pragmatized world of generalized market under neoliberal circumstances of economy, the logics of marketing, control of quality and attention to clients, the rhetoric of comfort generalized from within at least of second half’s of the nineties in the united states as well as in neoliberal capitalist south America, the idea of barters and economic transactions stablishing practical contingencies everywhere derived in two antinomy’s consequences, on the one side, it produced irreducible heterogeneization, pluralism and unlimited polysemy’s in regard to how deliberating senses and interpretations of cultures understanded semantically stimulating the imagination of a return to the idea of sites, while on the other hand it has simultaneously generated its reversals.

   In contrast with the profered nature of unsited audiences, the exchange with audiences, publics and collectors created the enthusiasm of a nostalgic of site specifics, while containing the opposite, the uncontrolled iteration of culture.

   Such a concept of iteration originally proposed by Derrida when he developed comparative analysis between speech and writing is related with how in speaking there is presupposed a contextual situation of discourses between self-centered speakers defined by their expressive intentions linked through that intensions to counterenuntiations, writing in reverse, supposed to be related with the isolation of inscription on the page when the readers are usually absents of presence, it is defined by a logic of sends since writing can be sended, transported, repited without contextual links to sited audiences.

   But the concept of iter in the place of writing have consequences beyond scriptural issues and evolve to be related with general culture, in fact, the idea of proffered audiences, absents of presence, is deeply linked to the complex relation between dissemination and polysemy in culture and it have an impact on the convival of antinomical genesis in this new world if we remember that around 1996 internet was not fully yet generalized and stablished in culture and the culture of marketing was not yet older than a decade since it started to born.

  The simultaneity of opposite genesis, intrinsically related with the new velocities and complexities of new technologies have generalized a universe of sociocultural antinomies in contemporary culture on the one side and at the same time, a return to site specifics, on the other and simultaneously the erasing of sited audiences and presencial exchanges dismissed by the prevalence of proffered audiences and the iteration of culture, something needed to incorporate certain elements of psychoanalysis inside cultural theory.

   In a few words our ideas of sociocultural environments that we sustained two decades ago seems to be out of date, it seems to be antiquaries when seem from the ultramodern and neotecnological age started since the mid-nineties although at the same time the nineties turn suggest the paradoxical genesis of a new sociocultural environment in which contemporary culture appears to be crossed by this two autonomic tendencies, the return to site beside the emptiness and desapariences of sites by proffered iterated forms of communications.

   In this book I explore to rethink and retheorization of a series of major issues in epistemology to be consider under such a new sociocultural phenomena’s mainly proposing new phenomenological avenues between philosophy and sociology to resolve responses around such an antinomic situation rediscussing paradigms of theory and research, how to deal and work with the challenge of the increscent iteration of culture and the paradoxes of site non site antinomic simultaneity in sociocultural genesis related with modern technology and marketing realities?. This challenge allow us to attempt new phenomenological avenues between clasical philosophy and sociology. This current book is devoted to develop that.